Discovery-stage Navi Mumbai, India IP-first · licensing model

The molecule is
the product.

Zobo Biosciences discovers novel bioactive molecules — for hair, skin, wound repair, renal protection and drug-resistant infection. We take a screening method that is eighty years proven, run it on instruments that did not exist when it was abandoned, protect what we find, and license it to the companies that already own manufacturing and distribution.

4
Discovery programs
12
Screened source libraries
2
Peptides characterised by LC-MS/MS
0
Rupees spent on marketing

01 The urgency

The world is running out of working antimicrobials.

Resistance is no longer a forecast problem. It is a present clinical failure, and it is concentrated in exactly the region we operate from.

39M

deaths from antibiotic-resistant infections forecast between 2025 and 2050 — roughly three every minute.

GRAM Project · The Lancet, 2024
1.91M

deaths per year directly attributable to AMR by 2050, up around 70% on 2022. 8.22M per year with AMR involved.

GRAM Project · The Lancet, 2024
4.3×

growth in reported clinical Candida auris cases in the US, from 1,471 in 2021 to 6,304 in 2024.

US CDC

South Asia is forecast to carry one of the highest AMR mortality rates on earth.

The same story is repeating in fungal disease. The WHO published its first Fungal Priority Pathogens List in 2022 — Candida auris, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans — and resistant dermatophytes such as Trichophyton indotineae are now endemic in India, where standard topical azoles are failing in routine practice. The molecules are needed here first.

02 The method

A proven classic technique, restarted with modern instruments.

Almost every antibiotic class in clinical use today came from natural-product screening — pulling bioactive compounds out of living material and testing them against real organisms. The industry walked away from it in the 1990s for combinatorial chemistry, which produced enormous libraries and almost no new antibiotic classes. The method was never the problem. The instruments were.

Then · why it stalled

The bottleneck was reading, not finding.

Dereplication was manual and slow — teams kept rediscovering the same known compounds. Structure elucidation took months per candidate. Screening throughput was limited by hand. Nothing about the biology was wrong; the cost of knowing what you had in the flask was simply too high, so the pharmaceutical industry stopped looking.

What replaced it generated millions of synthetic compounds and, over three decades, almost no new antibiotic classes. The drugs that still work in a hospital today are overwhelmingly the ones that came out of the older method, or chemical modifications of them. The field did not run out of natural chemistry. It ran out of patience with the cost of reading it.

Now · what changed

Every one of those bottlenecks has a modern answer.

  • LC-MS/MSPeptide and metabolite identity confirmed analytically in days, not months.
  • Sequence databasesAPD3, UniProt and BLAST matching to reject known compounds before assay spend.
  • In-silico screeningStructure, charge and amphipathicity modelled before a single plate is poured.
  • Modern assay panelsMIC/MBC against ESKAPE, Candida and dermatophyte panels at real throughput.
  • Cost geographyIndian cost base makes a screening cycle affordable at seed scale.

Our starting library is not a chemical catalogue. It is twelve food-grade plant sources screened for antimicrobial peptides — small, evolved-to-kill molecules that attack membrane architecture rather than a single enzyme, which is precisely why resistance is slow to develop against them. Two are already characterised: a black pepper nsLTP1 (Pepin-1 homologue, 78% identity to the APD3 reference) and a guava nsLTP2 (83% identity to the UniProt reference), both confirmed by LC-MS/MS. Starting from edible material is a commercial decision as much as a scientific one: it shortens the toxicology conversation and lets a molecule reach a shelf years before it could reach a clinic.

03 The engine

Biological problem to royalty stream, through six gates.

Every gate is a checkpoint that either kills the asset cheaply or raises its price. Nothing reaches a commercial partner before it has passed all of them.

01

Problem

A biological target with a real, unserved clinical or consumer failure behind it.

Gate · unmet need
02

Discovery

Source, extract, fractionate. Enrich for the active. Identify what is actually in the fraction.

Gate · novelty
03

Validation

Mechanism, potency, spectrum, stability and cytotoxicity established in vitro.

Gate · efficacy
04

IP filing

Provisional then PCT. Composition, sequence and use claims drafted around the evidence.

Gate · defensibility
05

Partnering

Data package taken to ingredient houses, dermatology, pharma and AMR funders.

Gate · commercial fit
06

Royalty

Upfront, milestones and a running royalty for the life of the patent. No inventory, no CAC.

Gate · recurring value

04 Pipeline

Four programs. One platform. Two time horizons.

The consumer programs reach revenue in months and pay for the lab. The therapeutic programs take years and carry the asymmetric upside. Running both from one discovery stack is what makes the second affordable.

01

Anti-Grey Hair

Consumer biology · cosmetic active

A proprietary molecule targeting melanocyte biology and follicular pigmentation — catalase activity, oxidative stress and melanin synthesis regulation at the follicle. Positioned as a licensable active with mechanistic evidence behind it, not as a consumer brand.

Licensees: global beauty conglomerates, specialty dermatology, cosmetic ingredient suppliers.

Stage2 / 6 · In-vitro
Risk: lowReward: highNo clinical trial
02

Wound Healing

Regenerative · topical therapeutic

Molecules targeting accelerated tissue repair and regeneration, with an antimicrobial component that addresses the infection burden which stalls most chronic wounds. The peptide chemistry serves both functions from one asset.

Licensees: medtech and pharmaceutical companies with regenerative medicine and tissue-repair portfolios.

Stage1 / 6 · Discovery
Risk: mediumReward: high
03

Renal Protector

Therapeutic · nephroprotection

Cellular-injury intervention and nephroprotection at the molecular level — an area with almost no approved protective agents and a patient population that only grows. The longest horizon in the portfolio and the largest licensing economics.

Licensees: pharma and biotech focused on nephrology, organ preservation and cellular-injury therapeutics.

Stage1 / 6 · Discovery
Risk: highReward: very high
04

Next-Gen Antibiotics & Antifungals

Anti-infective · WHO priority pathogens

Antimicrobial peptides acting on membrane architecture rather than a single enzyme target, screened against ESKAPE pathogens, Candida species including C. auris, and resistant dermatophytes. This is the program the world has already agreed to co-fund through CARB-X, BARDA, INCATE and BIRAC.

Licensees: anti-infective pharma, plus non-dilutive AMR funders as development partners.

Stage1–2 / 6 · In-vitro
Risk: highReward: very highGrant-eligible

05 Value creation

Asset value increases with evidence.

We do not create value by selling product. We create it by moving an asset up this ladder. Each rung removes a category of risk a licensee would otherwise have to price in — which is why the same molecule is worth an order of magnitude more at the top than at the bottom.

Stage 1
Discovery
Novel molecule concept identified and sourced.
Baseline
Stage 2
In-vitro
Biological activity proven. Potency, spectrum and cytotoxicity established.
Licensable — consumer
Stage 3
Patent + mechanism
IP defensibility secured. Mode of action characterised.
Partner conversations open
Stage 4
Animal proof-of-concept
Translational evidence generated. Therapeutic hypothesis survives a live system.
Major re-rating
Stage 5
Clinical
Human validation. The single largest step change in asset price.
Peak licensing leverage
Stage 6
Approval
Maximum de-risking. Royalty runs for the life of the patent.
Annuity

06 Licensing economics

What one molecule is actually worth.

These are not projections. They are the shape of disclosed licensing deals across small-molecule and peptide assets — the market's own pricing of an asset at each stage of evidence. One asset can pay across every line at once.

Asset typeStage at dealUpfrontMilestonesRoyalty on net sales
Cosmetic / topical active Safety + efficacy dossier complete $0.1M – $2M, or direct B2B supply margin $0.5M – $5M 2% – 6%
Antifungal / antibacterial lead Preclinical, IP filed $1M – $30M $50M – $300M Low single digit – 10%
The same asset, de-risked Phase I complete $20M – $150M+ $300M – $800M+ High single digit – mid-teens

06.1 Disclosed comparables

DealStageTermsWhy it matters
Solid Biosciences ← FA212 Preclinical candidate $1M upfront · up to $34M development + $21M sales milestones · low-single-digit royalties A single preclinical asset with no clinical data, ~$56M headline.
Regeneron ← CytomX Discovery collaboration $30M upfront · up to ~$0.8bn milestones · high-single to low-teen royalties Discovery-stage platform economics — the model we are building toward.
Biogen ← Stoke Clinical-stage $165M upfront · up to $385M milestones · low-double-digit to high-teen royalties What the same asset is worth once clinical risk is removed.

Source: company SEC filings, 2025. Full-year 2025 saw $250.2bn across 516 licensing deals — the most active year on record.

07 Targets

What this capital is expected to produce.

Discovery companies fail on vagueness. These are the specific artefacts that should exist at each checkpoint — and the ones an investor should hold us to.

Horizon 1 · 0–18 months

Evidence and first revenue

  • BSL-2 capable discovery lab commissioned and running
  • Twelve-source library re-established, fractionated and catalogued
  • MIC/MBC panels complete against ESKAPE, Candida spp. and dermatophytes
  • Three to five confirmed active fractions; two lead peptides selected
  • First provisional patent filed
  • Consumer active #1 dossier complete; two B2B pilot supply agreements signed
Horizon 2 · 18–36 months

Mechanism and defensibility

  • PCT filed on the lead peptide series
  • Mechanism-of-action studies and lead optimisation complete
  • Safety and stability package assembled to partner standard
  • Animal proof-of-concept initiated on the lead therapeutic
  • Non-dilutive funding secured — BIRAC, CARB-X, BARDA or INCATE track
  • First formal licensing conversations opened
Horizon 3 · 36–60 months

The company we are building

  • 10+ protected discoveries across consumer and therapeutic classes
  • 3–5 active licensing partnerships
  • 1+ asset advanced toward clinical stage
  • Recurring royalty revenue independent of any product we manufacture
  • India-originated biotech IP licensed into global markets

08 Why us

Six structural advantages, not six adjectives.

01

Founder-owned science

The peptide library, the extraction protocols and the LC-MS/MS characterisation come from the founder's own doctoral research in microbiology. Not licensed in, not subject to a university's terms.

02

Cost geography

A screening and characterisation programme that costs millions of dollars in Boston costs a fraction of that here. Our seed round buys years of experiments, not months.

03

Two horizons, one stack

Consumer actives reach revenue in 18–24 months and carry the lab. That means we are never forced to sell a therapeutic asset early because runway ran out.

04

Capital leverage

Antimicrobial discovery is one of the few fields the world funds with grants rather than equity. This round buys eligibility for capital many multiples its size, at zero further dilution.

05

A group that pays its bills

The founder operates existing revenue-generating businesses, including a D2C skincare brand that acts as a captive first customer and live testing ground for every consumer active.

06

Ecosystem alignment

BIRAC, C-CAMP and the CARB-X Global Accelerator Network's only non-Western accelerator are all in India — and all actively looking for exactly this.

09 The ask

Brands are rented.
Molecules are owned.

We are raising a seed round to build the discovery lab, generate the screening evidence, and file the first IP. Not to build a brand, not to buy media — every rupee goes into experiments, protection and the data package that a licensee will eventually pay for.

RoundSeed
Raising₹1 Cr – ₹2.5 Cr
Dilution10% – 15%
Target₹1.5 Cr at 12%
InstrumentPriced equity / CCPS
DeploymentR&D, IP, evidence generation
BaseNavi Mumbai, India